Um, give up 'mass education settings?'
If nine years of mayoral control, all sorts of experimentation and extra billions spent on incentives and other approaches leave the school system no better off, isn't it right to assume that the students -- for whatever mix of reasons -- are incapable of performing to reasonable standards in a mass education setting? And if that's the case, what are the implications?
See also http://www.minddump.org/its-pure-raw-poverty-stupid
